Loading…
Di corpus dey wrong somewhere. Everything wey big reach dis dey wrong somewhere. We really want corrections from Yorùbá scholars, speakers and practitioners, and di routes for dem dey here.
Di most valuable contribution and di easiest one to make. Every document page carry correction link. None of di items below compulsory: correction wey no get source still dey tell di project where to look.
Di document
Which page, by title or by URL.
Di passage
Quote am enough make person fit find am without confusion.
Wetin dey wrong
Di error itself, and wetin di correct account be if you get am.
Source, if you get one
Anything wey reader fit check: book and page, article, archive record, transcription.
Correction wey we accept, we go apply am, di document revision note go record am, and we go credit di contributor by name unless dem ask make we no do so. Correction wey we no accept go get reply wey explain why, and dat one na commitment about di reasoning, no be commitment to gree.
E different from factual error, and we take am serious at least as much.
If material for dis site no suppose dey public, because initiate pipo hold am, or because e belong to lineage wey never gree make dem publish am, or because di way we present am dey misrepresent living practice, talk am and put "handling" for di subject.
Where dat kain claim get backing, di material go come down while dem dey settle am, instead of staying up during di discussion. Na person dey review dis ones, no be queue.
Wetin di project commit to, and wetin e never commit to.
Within 3 working days. Dis one match di fastest acknowledgement window wey di comparable archives below publish, and na di only commitment wey no cost anything to hold.
Immediate once we acknowledge, for any handling report wey get backing. We withdraw di material first and di discussion follow after, wey na di sequence every comparable archive dey operate.
We never commit to any published window. Comparable archives dey publish anything from 10 working days to 6 weeks. Di project no go name number until e don run enough reports to sabi wetin e fit really hit, and published window wey we no meet go worse pass one wey we no publish.
We never commit to any published window. We dey apply factual corrections as we verify dem, and every one dey get reply, but no turnaround dey promised until monitored address dey and somebody dey monitor am.
For reference, National Library of Scotland dey publish definitive reply within 20 working days; UCL Digital Collections dey complete initial validity assessment within 10 working days with temporary removal for di meantime; Collections WA dey acknowledge within 3 business days with immediate temporary withdrawal, and dey decide within 10 business days.
For di order wey di corpus dey short of am.
Òwe with who talk am
Òwe from named speakers with region and dialect recorded. Di proverb collection na di project largest active gap and di one wey im rights position tight pass.
Oríkì and oral literature
With di same attribution requirements: who perform am, where, and when.
Dialect and how different area dey speak
Especially outside di Ọ̀yọ́-standard register wey dey dominate published sources.
Review translation
Anybody wey dey read Yorùbá and go check three-layer translation block against di original.
Scholarly review of section
Specialists wey ready to read one section against dia own field and mark wetin dey wrong.
Material wey pipo contribute dey credited. If dem contribute am under open licence, we note dat one beside am.